President Carter attended high school here. |
You often hear it said: “Funerals are for the living.” For years, whenever I experienced anticipatory grief over the inevitable death of President Jimmy Carter, I couldn’t imagine him having a huge state funeral. He was such a modest, unassuming man, not the kind of person to take on the trappings of royalty or to exalt himself personally in any manner. His concentration on negotiating for the release of hostages instead of his re-election campaign in 1980, for example, may have helped him (along with the hostage crisis) lose a second term in the White House, but he was never in doubt about the priorities of that time.
Political ambition is necessary in a political campaign, but Carter’s was not egoistic ambition. Rather, he saw a job that needed doing and that he believed he could do. I have written before today about Jimmy Carter’s presidency and how I see it. The words of Stuart Eizenstat, Carter’s chief domestic policy advisor, go far beyond my own and are worth reading carefully. But every tribute at the state funeral for President Carter in Washington, D.C., was moving. Ted Mondale read the words his father, former Vice President Walter Mondale, would have spoken had he not preceded Carter in death, words he and Carter agreed best summed up their four years of the Carter-Mondale White House: “We told the truth. We obeyed the law. We kept the peace.”
The first Carter news conference I watched when he was president astonished me. People from the press asked him questions – and instead of evading the questions, he did his best to answer them!
Obeying the law – shouldn’t that be a necessary basic assumption for any man or woman fit to sit in the Oval Office?
President Carter went beyond keeping peace by pursuing it for other parts of the world, notably the Middle East.
Since mine is a TV-free house, a friend who knows my longstanding devotion to Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter invited me to her house to watch the funeral, a state event with all the pomp and dignity and ritual owed to a man who probably had greater integrity than any other occupant of the White House in United States history. And the point was made that Jimmy Carter himself had planned his funeral, speakers and music selections and all.
It wasn’t long into the service that I realized why. He wouldn’t have done it for himself. After all, he was not in the audience, and, as I say, he was never a president to showcase himself as royalty. No, it was for us. His funeral was for the American people. He knew we needed it. And he was so right. We needed his reminder that we are one country and need to love our neighbors as ourselves.
Do you believe in miracles? Are you a dreamer? Or do you think that only hearts like mine, already yearning for the integrity of our 39th president, would or could be moved by the tributes spoken in memory of this good, good man? I want to think that words of praise for Jimmy, like the man himself, might open hearts and turn them toward the good.
Accomplishments are important, and Eizenstat among others listed many of President Carter’s, but the very least, I maintain, that we must ask of anyone coming to preside over our country is this:
We told the truth.
We obeyed the law.
Keeping the peace is undoubtedly harder--perhaps not always possible--but any human being has it in his or her power to tell the truth to the American people and to obey the laws of the land. We cannot do better than to honor the legacy of this great man by following his example.
Carter's boyhood home, Archery, GA |
6 comments:
Exactly right. I felt a little less sad after watching his funeral. It touched me, and reminded me there were still good people in the world.
You're probably correct: all the ceremony formality ended with a simple burial next to his wife at the old farm. IMO, one of the factors in his honesty was based on his background as a nuclear engineer (facts, figures - all else is distraction). Even that early, in the midst of developing nuclear subs, he resigned to go back to the peanut farm when his father died. In comparison and contrast, the sole other engineer to become
president was Herbert Hoover, who was already wealthy as
a mining engineer with a talent for finding rich lodes of gold around the world. I was surprised to learn that Hoover, in response the the Great Depression, ordered the deportation of over a millions Mexicans, blaming them for the financial crisis. He called it 'repatriation' and included many
American born Latinos. The twist and contrast continued - when Hoover died in 1964, it was a simpler one day affair with Lyndon Johnson and Barry Goldwater AND a young Richard Nixon, whose shame in office later led the
kind engineer peanut farmer to run for the office of the presidency. (Nixon's funeral was far from Washington)
You can't make this stuff up! But most people find history boring ?!
Your take on engineers as inherently truthful is interesting, Bob. I'm thinking it over. So, besides the importance of facts in engineering, you think that a similar valuation carries into other kinds of thinking. Did Hoover have anything he considered evidence for believing that Mexican workers caused the American financial crisis? Seems like a might long stretch of "facts" to me!
Bob! I did a little sleuthing. Nurses come in first place for truthfulness, veterinarians #2, engineers #3. Interesting that doctors did not make the top three, though nurses are veterinarians are right up there. What do we make of that?
Hmmm....bedside manners trump bad news?
(With the emphasis on Trump) Thanks for the sleuthing. From now on, I shall buy my used cars from an RN!
Bob, I went back to find a citation for you (don't know how to copy and paste on my phone) and NOTE that every site I look at lists the "most trusted" or those judged by Americans as "most trustworthy," which may or may not correlate to what I asked, i.e., the "most honest" professions. Anywhere, here is a citation: https://news.gallup.com/poll/608903/ethics-ratings-nearly-professions-down.aspx
You can doubtless find more.
Post a Comment