Search This Blog

Saturday, November 12, 2016

We Should Not Be Wall-Builders, Either


[What do you do when you can't sleep? I read and write.]

Saturday Morning Reflections

We who do not want to see a physical wall built between our country and Mexico must be careful not to build a social wall between ourselves and the Americans whose different views and votes carried the day on Tuesday, because “They” are not a homogeneous block but a diverse group, with diverse reasons for voting as they did.

·     Some are party loyalists and would have voted for the Republican candidate whoever he or she had been, and a certain segment of Republican party loyalists are of the all-government-is-bad stripe. (Ideologically, they are libertarians.) This group will always vote their ideology.

·     Others are one-issue voters (e.g., anti-abortion). One friend told me her group of Catholic women friends fall into this camp. All other issues, all other statements were unimportant to them.

·     Some “liked some of what he had to say” (e.g., “he talked about jobs”) enough that they could somehow set aside the rest. One woman told me she tried, in looking at both candidates, to set aside personality and character and look only at issues. Apparently there were people who could do that.

·     A very large segment flocked to the Republican Party because they had been feeling invisible and the Republican candidate paid attention to them. Most of the people in this group (amazingly! This came out in post-election coverage) won’t even care all that much if he fails to make good on his promises. Mobilization of the overlooked (overlooked by media and by mainstream politicos alike) is the #1 explanation favored by mainstream journalists in the election aftermath. I say it is significant, but it can only serve, in my view, as one explanation among others. We human beings crave simple explanations, but life is not always simple. Yes, this is an important factor (and we must all draw a lesson from it), but it is not the only factor.

·     Don’t forget that many who supported Bernie Sanders in the primary voted Republican in the election! Crossover vote from Democrat to Republican accounts for people (1) who believe that American workers have not benefited from trade agreements (I did NOT cross over, but I also believe that the agreements have benefited corporations at the expense of workers both at home and abroad; NAFTA was my biggest disappointment of the Bill Clinton administration) and (2) who want a president not beholden to the status quo.

·     Even the anti-Hillary contingent cannot be dismissed simply as anti-woman or anti-feminist. I voted for her but have never fully trusted either of the Clintons since NAFTA. Be honest, my dear fellow feminists: was she your ideal candidate? Not mine, but I voted for her because I mistrusted her opponent far, far more on almost every issue and could not stomach his behavior or rhetoric.

·     This brings us to racism and sexism and bigotry of all kinds. Undoubtedly, those played a part, and undoubtedly racism persists in this country, as does sexism and homophobia and xenophobia, etc. Unfortunately, too, the worst segment of that contingent now feels it has a mandate to act out its hate. And no, we cannot stand back in silence, and we cannot hide fearfully in our homes. We must oppose hatred and bigotry and persecution wherever we find them. But it’s important we not characterize half our country’s population on the basis of what I have to believe is a minority splinter contingent.

Nothing in my list above is meant to excuse odious speech or behavior on the part of the candidate or any of his supporters.

But now, two conclusions I hope you will share with me: First, supporters of the new president-elect cannot be dismissed as a monolithic demonic army of hate-mongers. And second, to prevent the social disintegration we so deeply fear it is important that we not build walls that would escalate divisions and turn our beloved country into warring camps.

President Obama never fails to amaze me, and he and the First Lady, Michelle, are the examples I would have us take for our own. We need to do as they have always done and continue to do: to oppose bigotry and hatred at every opportunity, to continue to listen to others, to demand and bestow respect for and on human beings, and to model the behavior we want to see surrounding us. I hope and fervently pray that the hour and a half the president-elect spent with the president the other day will have a lasting and beneficial effect on the future behavior of the man who will next inhabit the White House. I also hope, (somewhat desperately, I must admit: these are ugly, frightening times) that the president-elect will be inspired speak out publicly to rein in the worst behavior of his supporters. The sooner, the better. In fact, I hope it will have already happened before this post goes online.


4 comments:

Linda Roth said...

I totally agree that no matter who we voted for, we must stand together as Americans. What is is. I have gotten over the shock of Wednesday morning. The only sorrow I feel right now is for the other apartment owners who live in Trump Tower and the merchants who have shops on the ground floor and mezzanine. The place is in lockdown. The best thing that came out of this horrific election is it woke us up. There is something wrong within the Democratic Party that lost middle America and it needs addressing. The status quo was voted down. Instead of going at one another's throats, which we've been doing for quite some time, party ideology needs to be examined and revamped. Republican ideology too. There are a lot of Republicans who are as shocked as the Democrats at this vile, unorthodox man's election.

P. J. Grath said...

Linda, I think I'm past the shock during the day, and when I wake up in the middle of the night I'm right back there again. But yes, both major parties need to examine themselves seriously and realize that too many people have been left behind, left out, with advantages going instead to huge corporations and the already very wealthy.

I hope we can meet in person someday, you and I.

BB-Idaho said...

IMO, too much politics makes us warriors at best and raving madmen
at worst. I have written enough to have been invited to write in some
progressive blogs (which I turned down, having no desire to become
a raving madman...and being more than a bit lazy). That said, I was
pleased when my place of birth and home until college graduation,
Eau Claire County WI, was the sole N WI county to soundly repudiate
the Trump phenomenon. We note a typical letter to the editor there:
"In its eight years the Obama administration: cut the unemployment rate almost in half (9.6 to 4.9 percent); decreased the annual growth rate of government spending by more than 80 percent (8.4 to 1.4 percent); oversaw a rise of more than 10,000 points in the stock market (less than 8,000 to over 18,000); added 20 million Americans to the roll of the medically insured; cut our dependence on foreign oil in half (10 million barrels/day to five); and dropped the annual federal deficit by more than half.

Give the new guy four years to do half as well. Then we can decide how well the big-mouthed businessman long on lies but short on ideas stacks up against the Obama team."
- I would add that the 'big mouthed business man' has miles to go
before even minimal comparison to one of the classiest families to
live in the white house, the Obamas, will be made.
Color me partisan, I earned it! :)

P. J. Grath said...

BB, I am happy to color you in my camp! To the rest of you: all are welcome in our camp!