Let frustration get the upper
hand, and you could soon be up to your eyebrows in regret.
It could have been much worse
for me this week, however, which goes to show once more that many decisions are
better for having been postponed. My last post here on this blog was an
expression of frustration – frustration widely shared, apparently, because more
than one person suggested, even requested, that I edit that piece down for
publication in our county’s weekly newspaper or the daily paper in Traverse
City. One request was especially fervent. What to do?
I was reluctant. I’d said
what I had to say and was not looking for a wider audience. Would anything be
gained?
“At least think about it! And
would you call me back and let me know what you’ve decided?”
I spent the remainder of the
evening paring down an original thousand words plus to a manageable three
hundred. (I recommend this exercise, by the way. For a real wake-up call, edit
yourself ruthlessly to a word limit. Can you say it in 800 words? 600? 400?
Whole paragraphs reveal themselves as self-indulgent, unnecessary and/or
redundant, while sentences purged of clutter emerge taut and clear.)
Finally more or less
satisfied with the result, I pulled up an old letter I’d had published in a
Traverse City weekly last year for comparison. The subject of the earlier
letter was affordable housing, and I’d expressed myself to my satisfaction in
300 words.
But I was struck by the
glaring contrast between the two pieces.
My older letter, a response
to a previously published opinion article, focused on one particular issue and
analyzed problems with the opinion writer’s statements. Our differences had to
do with a situation and how to deal with it, and while he was clearly
conservative and I obviously liberal on this issue, the disagreement was
pragmatic rather than blindly partisan. The tone of my letter was – and not by
accident -- reasoned, calm, and dispassionate.
The newer 300 words were
entirely different. They contained no analysis and no new facts. The whole
thing was nothing but finger-pointing.
Important question:
What is the point of writing a letter to an editor or, if you’re the editor,
writing an editorial? What is the point of writing an opinion piece? Why wade
into those shark-infested waters at all unless you hope to open a few eyes
and minds to a new way of seeing shared terrain?
Partisan finger-pointing,
even absent name-calling (which I always try to avoid), will never change
anyone’s mind. It is not reasoned argument and not presentation of new facts.
Those who already agree with you will nod and cheer, while those on the other
side turn away in self-righteous anger. Everything, unless made worse, remains as it was.
Many people in our country
today do see politics as a war. True believers raise their voices ever louder
in a kind of locker room hysteria – finger-jabbing, shouting, name-calling,
metaphorically shoving and trampling their opponents. But to join in that fray,
on that level, if this is what we oppose, is to become the enemy,
to give up principles, to hand over victory.
I’m not saying I don’t still
believe what I wrote about party politics at the county, state, and national
level. What I’m saying is that saying it did no one any good. Putting my words
“out there” temporarily relieved
my unhappiness and gave a few others a brief sensation of solidarity. I expressed my frustration.
But really, who cares? I gave in to basically useless self-expression. That’s
all. Everything remains as it was. Not a single mind was changed or opened
to change.
Instead of becoming more and
more partisan, what we have to do in our county is to focus calmly on issues. Where facts are distorted, those distortions must be
cleared away in a workmanlike manner. Where facts are absent, they must be
brought forth. And as much as we talk, we all need to listen, especially where
we disagree, because no one’s mind will be opened by being hectored or lectured
or treated like an ignorant, willful child. Wouldn’t your blood pressure shoot through the roof if someone
treated you like that?
So now, in the aftermath of
my online outburst, I want to say that I think all the more highly of those in
politics who can remain undistracted
by frustration, who do not give in to it but keep their focus instead on the
work at hand. You know who you are. Thank you for the work you do!
There is no way toward a
civil discourse other than by adhering to civility. The next ten months will be
a trying time, but that can be a good thing. Rising to challenges can be good
for us all. I know all this. But how easily what we know can be forgotten in
the heat of the moment!
Postscript: I was
tempted to take down the previous post but am leaving it up, my moment of
weakness exposed, as an example to others and reminder to myself of what is not
worth doing.
3 comments:
I'd like to use some of this in a future post. Those of us fighting with the trucking industry would do well to remember that pointing fingers and raising our voices in anger does not, in reality change anyone's mind at the ATA. Civil discussion might.
Dawn, I would be honored if you could use anything I've written to help the cause of safer trucking on U.S. highways.
Beautifully written!
Thank You!
Post a Comment